Skip to main content

The fake news and propaganda war over little Bana of Aleppo, Syria

The war in Aleppo, Syria, has created many powerful visual images on social media. Thanks to the auto-scrolling of Facebook videos, and close captions provided by video producers, we cannot avoid disturbing clips like the one below. And many of us follow (what we believe to be) the poignant Twitter feeds of the Aleppo residents like the little Syrian girl Bana. But in the post-factual Internet of 2016, this narrative has been challenged as fake news and propaganda.

There are roughly the same number of views for this clip below which argues that the US is funding terrorism in Syria and that the clips and tweets described above are propaganda to support regime change.

There are sites which argue that the Twitter feed of Bana the little Syrian girl is actually Al Quaeda propaganda ( and
On the other hand, there are sites that argue that Bana's tweets are authentic, complete with geolocation (
Bana herself appears to be real, judging from this video interview after she was evacuated from Aleppo. But there will soon be sites claiming that this video was faked.

Both sides of the argument claim that the other side is pushing fake news and propaganda - the irony that fake news often labels the real news as 'fake'. Some of the Facebook comments are planted to support their side of the argument.
This is a challenge for media literacy and critical thinking, because we have to carefully evaluate which source we believe. The power of visuals often bypasses this analysis, especially if what we see corresponds to beliefs that we already have e.g. Assad is a murderous oppressor (one side) or  US is destabilizing regimes (the other side). In this case, both sets of beliefs may have elements of truth.
So which side do you believe?
Here are some resources from the National Library Board to help develop critical thinking - - with actual lessons at

It may change your view of the world.


Popular posts from this blog

Chapelton v Barry UDC (Exclusion Clauses)

Mr Chapelton went to a beach run by Barry UDC. See saw deckchairs. A notice next to them said,
"Barry Urban District Council. Cold Knap. Hire of chairs 2d. per session of 3 hours ... tickets should be obtained from attendants."  He got two chairs from an attendant, paid the money and got two tickets. He put them in his pocket. On the ticket was written,
"Available for three hours. Time expires where indicated by cut-off and should be retained and shown on request. The council will not be liable for any accident or damage arising from the hire of the chair."  When he sat on the chair it gave way and he was injured. Would the exemption clause work? The Court of Appeal held that Barry UDC made an offer when the chairs were on display, Mr Chapelton accepted when he picked up the chairs from the defendant, and the ticket was merely a receipt of the contract, so the exclusion clause could not be incorporated as a term, because it was too late.

A Picture Speaks a Thousand Words to Show Lee Kuan Yew's Impact on Singapore Economy

He led the team that turned mudflats into a metropolis, but could one graphic describe the impact that the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew had on Singapore? This one from the Economist does a pretty good job of representing it.

The underlying philosophy of the Visual Law School site is that complex issues and concepts (such as the law and legal principles) can be made more understandable by showing them in a visual or graphical format. This infographic will not replace the reams of text and hours of eulogies that will mark the life and impact the Mr Lee had on our country. But it is a relatively fair and balanced window into the story that helps to put that impact into a global and historical perspective. Read the full article at The Economist
Rest in Peace, Mr Lee, we will always be grateful for what you did.

Lim Geok Hian v Lim Guan Chin (Misrepresentation)

Lim Geok Hian (brother) convinced his sister Lim Guan Chin to sign a contract that : if their father bequeathed the family home to either of them, they would share the home equally instead. Actually, Lim Geok Hian already knew that his father had written a will bequeathing the entire house to Lim Guan Chin. But he expressedly or impliedly represented to her that it was likely that he would inherit the house. When the father died, Lim Geok Hian tried to enforce the contract. The Court of Appeal affirmed that since his sister was induced by the fraudulent misrepresentation to sign the contract, it could be set aside